I have a vertically fractured tooth (# 21) which needs to be removed. Given that, I have investigated both palatable options of a conventional bridge vs. an implant. I am leaning towards a bridge, as insurance will not cover an implant. I have a dentist, but am looking for a Dr. who specializes in cosmetic dentistry as the bridge will be quite visible. I am not a stranger to cosmetic and structural work in my mouth, sporting a gamut of veneers and crowns. I would also prefer a pure porcelain bridge vs. porcelain over metal, due to the hazing effect of the metal near the gum line (Yes, that’s how picky I am). However if there is a sizeable integrity advantage of metal, I would be open to consider statistical data.
I am inquiring with Dr. Chal as I am looking specifically for a seasoned cosmetic dentist.
Please help me to know the cost comparison of the two procedures and any other pros and cons you could share.
Thank you in advance for your time.
Bob
Bob,
The dental implant would likely be about 2/3 of the cost of the three-unit bridge to replace one tooth. But there are a number of variables here, and please don’t hold us to that. An examination could disclose any number of factors that would change that figure.
We do have a page on the site that gives some dollar figures for dental implant cost. You may want to check that out.
As far as the bridge option, Dr. Chal has been using the new zirconium ceramic for crown and bridge work. It is extremely strong, can be worked to precise tolerances, and would be more than adequate for a three-unit bridge such as yours. With no metal, there is no dark line at the gumline and no opaque materials to wrestle with.
Related links:
Teeth in an hour cost
Tooth replacement options discussed by Dr. Chal
Read more about dental implants